1763 – 1786: Governors of the Province of Quebec – England
1786 – 1841: Governor Generals of the “Province of Canada”
1791: The Constitutional Act [“An Act to repeal certain Parts of an Act, passed in the fourteenth Year of his Majesty’s Reign, intituled, An Act for making more effectual Provision for the Government of the Province of Quebec, in North America; and to make further Provision for the Government of the said Province“]
1841 – 1866: Governor Generals of the Province of Canada
1893: Statute Law Revisions Act (UK) – (Doug Force and Jean-Paul of InPower say that here, Removal of Sec. 2 of the BNA act, legally remove the Monarchy from Canada. Grace disagrees: this is not correct. What freed the provinces from colonization during the Great Depression (1931) was the Statute of Westminster, 1931 by Queen Victoria.)
**1931: Statute of Westminster [WhenQueen Victoria proclaimed the Statute of Westminster in 1931, it dissolved any notion of a federation and ensured that every province could be free of colonization and in fact be a republic (like Quebec with it’s own code/constitution)]
**1953 (Grace: “Queen Elizabeth II’s Coronation speech of 1957 actually stated that she swore allegiance to the Catholic Pope and that made her no longer a Queen/monarch, etc because they can only be the Head of the Church of England (Protestant)” … but I don’t see that ?) (does this really matter? maybe Pope is really in charge of church of England? and who decides what the monarch must be?)
1982: Canada Act 1982, 1982 Chapter 11 (contains the Constitution Act 1982) (The “constitution” is just a commercial agreement between corporations and not applicable to land/people, only waterways, and never really in effect because of section 59 anyways. And Grace: “Canada Actwas later repealed and the United Nations Act made active in 1985, which explains why Canada is following every policy that the UN and WHO dictate.”)
1982: Royal Proclamation of Constitution Act 1982 (Grace: This Constitution constantly referred to by the legal community is strictly a commercial document agreed to between the CROWN corporation and the corporation CANADA, and doesn’t apply to men and women on the land. it applies only to inland and coastal waters (according to Interpretations Act (see Grace’s email), does not mention men, women or children, or anything to do with land, for that matter.)
From the Proclamation: “section 58 of the Constitution Act, 1982, set out in Schedule B to the Canada Act, provides that the Constitution Act, 1982 shall, subject to section 59 thereof, come into force on a day to be fixed by proclamation issued under the Great Seal of Canada…the Constitution Act, 1982 shall, subject to section 59 thereof, come into force on the seventeenth day of April in the Year of Our Lord One Thousand Nine Hundred and Eighty-two“
And section 59 has never been satisfied anyways?
1983: Constitution Amendment Proclamation, 1983. An amendment of the Constitution Act, 1982 converting the status of the “Aboriginal People” from Sovereign to “Persons”.
1985: (Grace: Constitution Act of 1982 repealed; United Nations Act); Governor General’s Act
Interpretation Act, 1985. This Interpretation Act, under the definitions section, states clearly what “Canada” is (page 21): Canada, for greater certainty, includes the internal waters of Canada and the territorial sea of Canada; And again the definition that follows it is “Canadian Waters” and it is defined as: Canadian waters, includes the territorial sea of Canada and the internal waters of Canada; The key word here in identifying a grand deception is the word “includes”. Every law dictionary (and others) define includes as “to contain” and one of the universal common law maxims (principles of law) that Canada was founded upon states, for further clarity, “The inclusion of one is the exclusion of all others.” It is clear, with the definition of “includes” above, what The Interpretation Act defines Canada as. And it is even clearer when Canada is described as the exact same thing as “Canadian Waters”. So… What is Canada?
