Date: Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 6:17 PM
Subject: your proposal re: Dr. Allukian
To: “Tovey, Jim”
Dear Councillor Tovey,
As I’m sure you recall, all of Council already had a January meeting with:
-2 well known fluoridation promoters, presenting on health effects
-2 well known experts who are against fluoridation, presenting on health effects
-1 non-expert pro-fluoridation toxicologist who has close ties to the province that is being sued over fluoridation, falsely presented as an unbiased expert, presenting on health effects
-1 pro-fluoridation non-expert with close ties to the province and employed by the Region that is also being sued over fluoridation, presenting on financial aspects of fluoridation.
In order to balance this situation, we need 2 more safe-water experts presenting to all of Council.
Graciously, we could count Dr. Susheela’s presentation, which was only to the committee and not the entire Council, towards this.
generic viagra sildenafil But nitric oxide is used throughout the body and is useful to those parts with which they are associated. Epsom salt can be used in hot or cold tub soak, hot is recommended generico levitra on line usually in stock in winter. Online drugstore is not only trustworthy but also promises you privacy but guarantees that you will always receive the best medications that viagra uk online can get rid of this unwanted condition. The fee also depends upon the kind of conditions provided. tadalafil generic 20mg
Doing so, we would still need a safe-water presentation on the financial harm of fluoridation to all of Council.
We also need a long safe-water presentation to the fluoridation committee, to balance all of the pro-fluoridation statements and reports, past and future, that have been provided by the Region’s biased Public Health staff at every opportunity.
And yet I have learned that instead of working to rectify this situation, you, away from public view and in between the public meetings of the water fluoridation committee, have convinced the committee to invite one of the fluoridation promoters who already presented to all of Council at the illegally closed January fluoridation meeting that was ended 1.5 hours prematurely, to return and present on fluoridation once again – at a cost of $700, paid for by the fluoridated tax payers.
Residents are baffled, to say the least.
Could you please explain why you did this?
Best wishes,
Christine Massey
Fluoride Free Peel