Posted March 1, 2022
Below is an email that I sent on Mon, Feb 28, 3:32 PM, to Dr. Lynn Flynn and others who are on the email list of Doctors for Covid Ethics
Response to Lynn Flynn, MD, re the sources she cited yesterday on zoom as proof of “the virus”:
Lynn said: “See Figure 2:”
Viral Architecture of SARS-CoV-2 with Post-Fusion Spike Revealed by Cryo-EM
https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.03.02.972927v1.full.pdf
Vero, LLC-MK2 and Huh-7 cells were used for the “virus isolation”.
The patient sample was contaminated with cell lines, including the typical monkey kidney cells, plus cow material (FBS) and toxic drugs. This is the opposite of isolating anything. Isolation in culture = oxymoron.
A scientist would have an independent variable that is manipulated to test for its effects. But virologists are not scientists, so they skip trying to find and purify a potential virus from the patient sample, to use as the independent variable in a controlled experiment. Instead, they unscientifically, irrationally starve and poison cell lines, then attribute causation of the effects to an imaginary virus.
“Typical cytopathic effects (CPE) were observed at 4 days post inoculation (dpi) in Vero cell, including cell rounding, shrinkage, lysis, and detachment throughout the cell monolayer…”
The authors make continual irrational references to “the virus” and “viral RNA”. Verbally designating RNA as “viral” does not make it so. It’s just a soup of RNA:
“Viral RNAs from BALF and cell culture supernatant were extracted using the QIAamp RNA Viral Kit.”
They then perform an utterly meaningless test (PCR) that does not detect a disease or infection or any amount of “virus” or even a genome, just a tiny little sequence, but interpret the result as evidence of “the virus”. Meanwhile the alleged virus has never been sequenced or shown to exist by anyone on Earth, and is purely theoretical.
Likewise:
“The bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) sample was collected and subjected to next-generation sequencing” … “The assembled sequence…”
So the authors assembled, not discovered, another fraudulent, meaningless “genome” from sequences detected (not necessarily in a reliable fashion) in BALF.
Lynn refers us to Figure 2, the EM images. All sorts of wildly unnatural manipulations have to occur before an EM image is produced, meaning that the result doesn’t necessarily reflect the reality inside a monkey, cow or human body. Putting all that aside…
According to the authors:
In patient levitra properien click for info that had problems with heart may increase stroke or arrhythmia. Kamagra oral jelly Erectile dysfunction, or ED, affects millions buy cheapest cialis of people across the globe are being diagnosed with erectile dysfunction in the UK. Now, you are more or less familiar with the attainable scopes and the steps needed to take for overcoming the erectile issues that is experienced by the masculine world & viagra pills without prescription it also frees them from the problems of male impotency whereas; it has also led for the improvisation of the life of intimacy of the people. Dangers of ED Erectile raindogscine.com generic cialis tadalafil dysfunction is not a serious disease.
The virion particles are roughly spherical or moderately pleiomorphic, with diameters range from 80nm-160nm…. Though lots of the particles lost spike during purification or deactivation…
So the authors assumed that the anticipated spikes had been present (on these particles of inconsistent size) but were lost during purification. Because science.
More importantly, can an image of some (allegedly purified) particles from a monkey/cow/human mixture prove where the particles came from or what they do? Obviously not. Where are the large-scale studies scientifically confirming that these same particles are actually present in humans with a particular respiratory disease and not in people without the disease? Those studies don’t exist. Where are the controlled experiments showing that these same particles cause the spread “covid” in animals via natural modes of exposure? They don’t exist.
“See these publications with isolation:”
https://journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/mra.00169-20?permanently=true – The authors do not claim to have isolated a virus in this paper, only to have sequenced (a bogus “isolate”). They describe another meaningless “genome” never shown to correspond to anything in the physical realm, created from loads of sequences (allegedly) detected (via PCR) in an oropharyngeal swab specimen, trimmed/mapped/aligned/overlapped/assembled. Blatant fraud.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32080990/ -The authors of this “brief communication” immediately contaminated the patient sample with bovine serum albumin, antibiotics etc. in the viral transport media(Copan Diagnostics Inc., Murrieta, CA, USA: https://www.copanusa.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/UTM-Package-Insert.pdf), then mixed it with the monkey cells. They then blamed the assumed “virus” (that they never looked for or found in the patient sample) for cytopathic effects on the monkey cells. They don’t disclose how much fetal bovine serum and antibiotics were used, or how exactly their so-called “controls” were treated, but there’s enough information here to see that nothing was isolated/purified from the patient sample, that the experiment is not adequately controlled, and that they didn’t even have a specific thing (suspected “virus”) as the independent variable.
They created another meaningless, fraudulent “genome”, never shown to correspond to anything in the physical realm:
For whole genome sequencing of the virus isolate … culture supernatant of Vero cells infected was used for RNA extraction. … Sequencing was performed on an Illumina Nextseq 500 platform, produced on average a total of 150 million reads…
They added arrows to an EM image, insisting “that’s the virus”, with zero evidence to back up their claim. The alleged 30,000 base pair RNA genome with a spikey protein shell that uses ACE2 receptor is not even shown to exist, let alone cause any disease.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32237278/ This Australian study is featured on my FOI page as a blatant example of fraudulent pseudoscience. I also have FOIs responses from the related institutions showing that none have any record of anyone on the planet having found the alleged virus in the bodily fluids of any sick human and isolated/purified so that “it” could be sequenced, characterized and studied with controlled experiments (here, here, here). Others have written and spoken about it as well, including a former Senior Scientist with >30 years experience at Health Canada, Saeed Qureshi, PhD and Dr. Thomas Cowan (@1:16:25 here).
https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/lab/grows-virus-cell-culture.html?CDC_AA_refVal=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cdc.gov%2Fcoronavirus%2F2019-ncov%2Fphp%2Fgrows-virus-cell-culture.html – This is not a study, just a webpage of the CDC where they admit that they immediately contaminated their patient sample by adding it to a cell line (they actually contaminated it even sooner, during storage in virus transport medium containing fetal bovine serum and toxic drugs, as per the CDC’s SOP #DSR-052-05). The cited paper by Harcourt et al. was easily debunked back in 2020. Another fabricated “genome”, and cytopathic effects in monkey cells passed off a “virus isolation”. Nothing isolated/purified, no specific thing sequenced or characterized or studied with controlled experiments. Dr. Cowan accurately called it “fraud” here. I addressed it here.
https://www.gettyimages.com/photos/covid-19-virus-microscope
Pictures of particles are not proof of an RNA genome of 30,000 base pairs with a spiky protein shell that uses ACE2 receptor and spreads disease from host to host via natural modes of exposure… especially the cartoon and CGI pictures, and the photos of lab technicians peering into a microscope. None of these images show particles that were found in the bodily fluids of a sick human and purified (my FOI collection basically proves this and I challenge anyone to prove me wrong). None show a particle that has been proven to be a disease-spreading “virus”.
“A decent read satisfying Koch’s postulates:
https://www.auckland.ac.nz/en/news/2020/11/16/kochs-postulates-covid-and-misinformation-rabbit-holes.html”
This article is a red herring as far as I’m concerned. I have never sought proof that Koch’s postulates were satisfied for any virus, because we know that a strict application of Koch’s would not be possible even if a virus existed. (And the author, who I have communicated with, provides no proof of “the virus”.)
Nevertheless, you can find articles even in Nature falsely claiming that Koch’s have been satisfied for the theoretical SARS-COV-2, and an author on the Australian paper cited further below by Lynn, Jason Roberts, insisted to a colleague of mine that Koch’s have been satisfied, and the very next paper below cited by Lynn (falsely) states: “Besides satisfying Koch’s postulates...” People often say “Koch’s” as a shorthand for modified logic-based steps that could be satisfied if viruses actually existed.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32215622/ This a hamster study, it doesn’t even claim to have isolated any virus from humans. The authors used a fake SARS-COV-2 isolate from another study (which was never shown to have anything to do with a virus – feel free to prove me wrong) and found that hamsters that were intranasally inoculated with the fake isolate under intraperitoneal ketamine and xylazine anesthesia developed lethargy, ruffled fur, hunched back posture, and rapid breathing. Meaningless.
Now to anyone trying to swap out the fake virus for the spike protein, claiming that “SARS-COV-2” is actually a spike protein that accomplishes what the fake virus was said to accomplish:
Please show me where there are validated tests for the spike protein that were administered throughout “covid” and upon which all the “cases” were created. They don’t exist. It was PCR that was used to create the vast majority of “cases” and PCR only makes copies of tiny sequences, it does not confirm the presence of a protein.
Telling people that “SARS-COV-2” is a spike protein will add another whole layer of unnecessary confusion to this saga. “SARS-COV-2” does not exist, period, and there is no common denominator behind the 100% meaningless “cases”.
Christine