(Be sure to check out the 1919 Spanish flu study by Roseau. Some excerpts are provided at the bottom of this page)
CDC can’t find any studies demonstrating contagion of colds/flu/fake-covid… because they don’t exist
Latest in long string of CDC “germ” FOI failures
November 25, 2023 newsletter:
https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/cdc-cant-find-any-studies-demonstrating-contagion-of-colds-flu-fake-covid-because-they-dont-exist/
CDC has no scientific evidence that pox or measles symptoms are contagious
Just irrelevant webpages… once again
January 28 2024 newsletter:
https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/cdc-has-no-scientific-evidence-that-pox-or-measles-symptoms-are-contagious/
India’s Council of Medical Research – no records showing contagion of “covid-19”
April / June 2021:
India’s Council of Medical Research twice failed to provide or cite any record proving contagion of “COVID-19” or causation by “the virus”, for the requester:
https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/ICMR-contagion-causation-PACKAGE-redacted.pdf
Department of Health and Social Care, Isle of Man – no records showing contagion of “covid-19” involving alleged “Omicron” or “Kent Strain”
January 19, 2022:
Department of Health and Social Care, Isle of Man (British Isles) confirmed for Courtenay Adam-Lawrence that they have no record of the following for either the alleged “Omicron” or “Kent Strain” of the imaginary “SARS-COV-2”:
– unique whole genome sequence
– test procedures
– isolation/purification
– contagion
– confirmation that “it’ is not simply an in-silico computer made-up model of a strain of a virus:
https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/Isle-of-Man-DHSC.pdf
Argentina’s Ministry of Health has no scientific evidence that “COVID-19” is contagious
June 18, 2021: Argentina’s Ministry of Health strongly suggested in an FOI response to Ana Maria Daverede re the meaningless “COVID-19” PCR tests that they too have no record of “the virus” having been purified.
In point 4 they mention:
“by not having viral isolates available …”
And in point 9:
“does not serve to discriminate carriage, infection, disease, contagiousness, transmissibility …”
https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Argentina-no-aislamiento-del-sarscov.pdf
VIDEO: Admiten que no existe el coronavirus: Develan la gran farsa
https://canal7salta.com/2021/06/24/argentina-video-admiten-que-no-existe-el-coronavirus-develan-la-gran-farsa/
CDC admits: no scientific evidence of cowpox or Alaskapox “virus”… or contagion of symptoms
“Virus” faker Michelle Haywood, Member of House of Keys, Isle of Man fails scientific evidence challenge re “coronaviruses” and contagion
“H5N1”: Canadian Food Inspection Agency still can’t find valid evidence that it exists… or that symptoms are contagious
CDC “experts” fail to cite scientific evidence of “canine parvovirus” or contagion of symptoms
May 3, 2024:
Roger Andoh acting as FOIA Officer in the Office of the Chief Operating Officer confessed that the “experts” at the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry have no studies/reports that:
– scientifically prove/provide evidence of the existence of the alleged “canine parvovirus” (showing that the alleged particles exist and cause the illness/symptoms that they are alleged to cause),
– or even records that describe purification of particles that are alleged to be “canine parvoviruses” directly from bodily fluid/tissue/excrement of alleged “hosts” with purification confirmed via EM imaging,
– or records that demonstrate contagion of the dis-ease / symptoms that are allegedly caused by said alleged “virus”.
Roger went on to speculate that:
You may be interested in the following articles:
https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/13/8/07-0505_article
https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/13790
however
– Roger’s first link leads to a 2 page “dispatch” describing PCR-“positive” poop and so-called “cell-culture–adapted CPV strains” that were fake-“isolated” from dogs with diarrhea, and so-called “viral” DNA “extracted from the supernatants of fecal homogenates or from the viral suspensions by boiling for 10 min and chilling on ice”. The authors deemed the DNA to be “viral” simply because, well… that’s what virologists do.
– Roger’s 2nd link doesn’t lead to a study but rather a “perspective” on never-shown-to-exist canine viruses allegedly infecting… cats.
Communications:
https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/CDC-canine-parvovirus-PACKAGE-redacted.pdf
Also, see:
Daniel Roytas reviewed >200 studies and found zero scientific evidence that colds are contagious:
https://www.humanley.com/books
Evidence against the alleged contagion of Scarlet Fever:
https://aldhissla.substack.com/p/the-infectious-myth-busted-is-scarlet
Evidence against the alleged contagion of the plague:
https://aldhissla.substack.com/p/the-infectious-myth-busted-is-plague
Poliomyelitis – failed transmission studies and epidemiological observations against the contagion narrative
Quotes and references – archive last updated 30-04-2024
The embedded video can be downloaded here:
https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-admin/media-new.php
Thank you to Aldhissla, who collected these studies and thank you to Archit for creating the video. For more details see:
https://aldhissla.substack.com/p/the-case-against-polio-contagion
Shareable document link:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/e/2PACX-1vQMpyuzAjt3OcpeY1fx7QEBy_uVPbzbbfS-Z-rV4DIAo8PFzrCYiu0HUMvGyJEljgu2CadpcbOZqs2v/pub
Google drive: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1XUIU2_IDKsKG2cbKjZjVCCTyXjnvKMWN?usp=sharing
Odysee platform:
https://odysee.com/@fight_for_rights:1/poliomyelitis-failed-transmission-studies-and-epidemiological-observations-against-contagion-updated-30042024:3
Telegram Channel:
https://t.me/towardsindividualism/582
1918 Rosenau study:
https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/Rosenau-MODE-OF-SPREAD-OF-INFLUENZA.pdf
“The researchers carefully extracted throat and nasal mucus and even lung material from cadavers and transferred it to the throats, respiratory tracts, and noses of volunteers.“ .. “Then they drew blood from those who were sick and injected it into ten volunteers…. None of these took sick in any way.”
“...we collected the material and mucous secretions of the mouth and nose and throat and bronchi from cases of the disease and transferred this to our volunteers. We always obtained this material in the same way: The patient with fever, in bed, has a large, shallow, traylike arrangement before him or her, and we washed out one nostril with some sterile salt solution, using perhaps 5 ce., which is allowed to run into this tray ; and that nostril is blown vigorously into the tray. This is repeated with the other nostril. The patient then gargles with some of the solution. Next we obtain some bronchial mucus through coughing, and then we swab the mucous surface of each nares and also the mucous membrane of the throat. We place these swabs with the material in a bottle with glass beads, and add all the material obtained in the tray. This is the stuff we transfer to our volunteers. In this particular experiment, in which we used ten volunteers, each of them received a comparatively small quantity of this, about 1 c.c. sprayed into each nostril and into the throat, while inspiring, and on the eye. None of these took sick.”
…”The volunteer was led up to the bedside of the patient; he was introduced. He sat down alongside the bed of the patient. They shook hands, and. by instructions, he got as close as he conveniently could, and they talked· for live minutes. At the end of the five minutes, the patient breathed out as hard as he could, while the volunteer, muzzle to muzzle (in accordance with his instructions, about 2 inches between the two), received this expired -breath, and at the same time was breathing in as the patient breathed out. This they repeated five times, and they did it fairly faithfully in almost all of the instances. After they had done this for five times, the patient coughed directly into the face of the volunteer, face to face, five différent times. I may say that the volunteers were perfectly splendid about carrying out the technic of these experiments. They did it with a high idealism. They were inspired with the thought that they might help others. They went through the program in a splendid spirit. After our volunteer had had this sort of contact with the patient, talking and chatting and shaking hands with him for five minutes, and receiving his breath five times, and then his cough five times directly in his face, he moved to the next patient whom we had selected, and repeated this, and so on, until this volunteer had had that sort of contact with ten different cases of influenza, in different stages of the disease, mostly fresh cases, none of them more than three days old. We will remember that each one of the ten volunteers had that sort of intimate contact with each one of the ten different influenza patients. They were watched carefully for seven days—and none of them took sick in any way.“