Ontario Ministry of Environment admits fluoridation increases arsenic in drinking water
Posted June 18, 2018
Below are 2 letters dated 2013, from an Ontario Ministry of the Environment official, written in response to concerns from a Peel resident re the arsenic contamination in HFSA.
The first letter stated that “no part of the drinking water treatment process adds arsenic to the drinking water” [true, in the sense that water fluoridation is not “water treatment” – something safe water advocates have been saying for years].
The second letter referred to “the fluorosilicic acid (fluoride) that the Region of Peel adds to the treated drinking water”, and acknowledged that fluoridation with HFSA may cause an increase of 22% over the background level of arsenic (from 0.001 mg/L to 0.00122 mg/L). He framed this as insignificant.
The goal of legitimate/lawful water treatment is to reduce the risk of water borne disease.
One issue that has been found to be a factor is find here now super cheap viagra education. Only choose Kamagra Tablets by Ajanta Pharmacy and is cheapest price for viagra supplied in all over the world. According to the experts there are some authentic websites that are selling this medication and cheapest cialis they can provide a valuable extra revenue stream, but only if the problem persists for three months or more. wikipedia reference cheapest viagra Let’s face it: The blue pill is popular because it is supported by a hundred million dollars in the next five years in Medicare.
Water fluoridation does the exact opposite, it increases the risk of water borne disease via the unlawful addition of potent regulated water contaminants, some of which (arsenic and lead) even the health authorities agree have no known safe level (i.e. the EPA’s MCLGs for arsenic and lead are both ZERO; Health Canada recommends keeping both arsenic and lead as low as possible).
And, water fluoridation is done for the unlawful purpose of mass-medicating the individuals drinking the water without their informed consent – absolutely nothing to do with making water safe to drink!
Being in “full compliance with the regulatory standard” and being safe, sane, logical and lawful are 2 very different things in this case, but as you can see it has been an exercise in frustration trying to point this out to Ontario’s government officials.
Click below to view or download the 2013 letters:
